![]() |
|
||
Annika Sorenstam v. Danica Patrick: who deserves it more?
Wednesday June 15, 2005 | 14:17:32 446 words, 3144 views
I had a great time the other day chatting with Roc and Manuch on their Calling All Sports radio show (ESPN Radio’s Phoenix affiliate). The conversation? Annika versus Danica. Why does Danica, with one big race to her name, get all that press, while Annika, the most dominant woman golfer ever, doesn’t? The question is just begging to be asked, and not just because their names rhyme. Here’s my take: Danica’s hot stuff right now because not only did she make history, the first woman to ever lead the Indy 500, eventually placing fourth, but because her doing so is making people rethink the sport. Racing just got turned upside down. Suddenly, it’s “well why shouldn’t women race against the guys?” You even have whiners like Robby Gordon, bitching that women are the ones with the unfair advantage, since they weigh less. He says he won’t race against her unless they start weighting her car. Excuse me for a second: bwa ha ha ha ha! Is that a promise, Robby? Have you been reading from the Book of Vijay? Danica’s not the first of her gender to race. Back in 1978 a woman named Janet Guthrie made a good run at the Indy 500, placing ninth. After three years of enduring sexist nonsense and chasing nonexistent sponsorships, she gave it up. But times have changed, and the world is a different place. Now it’s ready for women like Danica. She’s broken a barrier by proving that women not only belong in the racing world, but may well eventually dominate it. And there are no “women’s tees” in the Indy 500. No special considerations for Danica. She ran the same race as everyone else, and she beat almost 90% of the field. Meanwhile, there’s Annika, halfway to a Grand Slam, 62 tournament wins, 5 of the last 9 majors in her pocket, and your average man on the street has probably never heard of her. Does she deserve more press? Of course. Does she deserve it more than Danica? Not necessarily. She’s setting new records, and raising the bar for women, but she hasn’t broken any barriers just yet. When she played against the guys in the 2003 Bank of America Colonial she didn’t make the cut. I wish she’d try again. She’s playing a different game these days than she was two years ago. The day a woman plays on the PGA Tour, from the same tees, and makes the cut, that’ll be the day a new barrier is broken. Robby Gordon and Vijay Singh will throw themselves a pity party, and the media will have a new darling. Comments:
Comment from: Arlen C. Nimrod [Visitor]
Everyone fails to note that Danica risks her life for her sport. Now THAT'S commitment. I guess a golfer could get struck by lightning....
Comment from: Golf Grouch [Visitor] · http://www.grouchygolf.blogspot.com
Jennifer, you nailed the Pro V1 on the screws with this article.
Rob Gordon is such an idiot. If weight matters so much in auto racing, then wouldn't light-weight drivers dominate? Horse-jockeys would have a new sport. If Annika can't be the next "Danica," maybe Wie could...
Comment from: Archie [Visitor] · http://none
Pleeeeeease get off the 'Annika doesn't get enough press' crap. It's become such a tired rant. Annika doesn't get press because few people care about women's golf. It's the same reason nobody cares/knows who won the WNBA title. And if you think Annika would magically make the cut in a PGA tour event this year just because she's dominating a bunch of inconsistent female golfers, you need to do some more research about the PGA tour. Annika played to her absolute best on a course that was perfectly suited to her in weather conditions that were most favorable to her as well, and she still would have missed the cut even if she had replicated that performance on day 2 rather than melting down like she did. I think Annika is an amazing golfer; probably the best female golfer ever. But no excuses are necessary because the public doesn't care much. Further, she is NOT in any way deserving of the 'best athlete' status certain members of the press want to afford her. That's such a ridiculous comment that it's not worthy of more than a chuckle, much less a response.
And regarding Robby Gordon's comments about Danica, you really should know what you're talking about before you spout on subjects other than golf. In racing, weight is everything and a 100 lb. difference in a car that weighs under 2,000 lbs is a very material difference. Danica is a very skilled race car driver and deserves all the accolades she has received, but that doesn't mean Gordon's comments weren't accurate. They were. But hey, in today's environment, political correctness seems to trump brutal honesty ever time.
Comment from: Commentator [Visitor]
Okay, Danica has definately made a ripple in the racing world, to the point that rules regarding weight are being considered. This isn't a bad idea, but setting an average weight for the drivers is not exactly logical, considering that some drivers are not going to be able to drop 25 pounds in a healthy way and Danica putting on 25 pounds may not be beneficial to her health either. Instead why not consider setting an average weight of car and driver. For instance Danica adds more weight, others lose the weight, by whatever means legally, possibly, and safely to car or driver, their is no advantage among the drivers, but simply who's the better driver. This may be far fetched, but hey it's what came to mind.
Comment from: Jojo [Visitor]
Danica is significantly lighter than the other drivers she competes against and it does make a difference. While some male drivers may weigh 20-30 pounds lighter than their peers, Danica weighs 110 pounds less than some of the guys. IRL teams have estimated that this gives her a 1 mph advantage over the field. This equates to about 30 seconds over an entire race. 30 seconds is significant. That could mean the difference between 1st place and 10th. Even if they are exaggerating the advantage and it really is a 0.5 mph advantage, you're talking 15 seconds and 4 or 5 positions.
As for Danica receiving much more attention than Annika, two reasons readily come to mind: (1) auto racing is a much more popular sport to watch than golf is, and (2) Danica can be considered a babe; Annika, not so much.
Comment from: Joseph [Visitor]
Robby Gordon owns Danica, Danica only ran well because of topped equipment that gives more edge, Robby Gordon would dominate if he had her car
Comment from: Josh [Visitor]
Robby Gordon couldn't drive a short stick up a dogs ass. If you think he has talent, maybe you should check out a NASCAR race. When it comes to road courses, he knows his way around, but when it comes to ovals, he's lost. Gordon drove for Richard Childress, and achieved 3 wins in I believe 3 years. Two were at road courses,(where he has a signifigant amount more experience than his competitors) and one was at a 1.5 mile oval where he stayed out under caution and it started raining. Considering Danica comes from a road-racing background, i'd say she's done well on the ovals considering she hasn't done it before.
Leave a comment: |
My Latest posts
Check it out!
Misc |
|||||||||
| Add GolfPublisher.com articles/headlines to your web site | |
| © Copyright 1997-2009, WorldGolf.com, LLC. For questions, comments or suggestions on any of our network publications, Contact Us! |
|